Archived Version: August 7, 2012


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Douglas McQuaid

 

Washington Supreme Court

Position 2

Douglas McQuaid

Legal/Judicial Experience: Associate/Partner: Aiken, St. Lois & Siljeg, P.S., Seattle, WA (10/74 - 4/94); Sole Practitioner: West Seattle (4/94 - Present); Practiced full-time as general practitioner in most areas of the law in the state of Washington.

Other Professional Experience: Owner/manager of private businesses (1996 - Present).

Education: University of Washington: B.A. in Business Administration - Finance (1967); Willamette University College of Law: Doctor of Jurisprudence (1972).

Community Service: Numerous hours devoted to pro bono legal services; Volunteer in self-help organizations for drug/alcohol addicts (2006 - Present); I belong to numerous community and charitable organizations.

Statement: As a true Washingtonian, I was born, lived and worked my entire life in this state. I interrupted my legal education to serve as a combat infantry soldier in the Vietnam War (1969-1970) and was awarded numerous combat medals. Upon return from the war, I completed my legal education at Willamette and came back to my home in Bellevue and began my legal career. I have 40 years experience practicing in most areas of the law in the state of Washington.

Based on my long and varied legal career, I am the best qualified candidate to hold the position of Supreme Court Justice. I am not an advocate for any individual cause or person. I will be impartial, unbiased, independent to serve all the people of this state equally with dignity and respect. Money, politics and justice don't mix. I will not solicit donations or endorsements from any organization with a special interest as it could appear to corrupt the independence and non-partisanship of the office.

I will be rigorously honest in deciding all cases coming before me and apply the Constitution and laws strictly as written to the facts of each case.


 
Campaign web site:  
Email: mcquaidlaw@comcast.net
 
Opponents: Susan Owens, Scott Stafne
 

Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION DOUGLAS
McQUAID
SUSAN
OWENS
SCOTT
STAFNE
Joint Asian
Judicial

Evaluation Committee
* * Not Qualified
Justice for Washington
Foundation
Unqualified Qualified Unqualified
King County Bar Association Refused to
Cooperate
Well Qualified Not Qualified
Q-Law: The GLBT
Bar Association of Washington
* Exceptionally
Well Qualified
*
Seattle Metropolitan
Elections Committee
* Highly
Recommended
Highly
Recommended
Tacoma-Pierce County
Bar Association
* * Not Qualified
Washington Association
of Prosecuting Attorneys
* * Not Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings from all organizations for all candidates, and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER DOUGLAS
McQUAID
SUSAN
OWENS
SCOTT
STAFNE
The Columbian    
Kitsap Sun    
Seattle Times    
The Stranger    
Tri-City Herald    
Tacoma News Tribune    
Yakima Herald-Republic    

 

Finance report:

See individual contributors:
Susan Owens


 
Media stories:
    July 26, 2012
Seattle Times   Primary to determine one State Supreme Court race
Seattle P-I   Hilyer boosted over Sanders in judicial rating
    July 22, 2012
Seattle P-I   Challengers no-shows at Supreme Court forum

 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.