w

 

Archived Version: August 7, 2012


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Indu Thomas

 

Thurston County Superior Court

Department 4

Christine SchallerLegal/Judicial Experience: 15 years of experience including judicial, trial and appellate practice, and policy work. Admitted to Washington State Bar Association, U.S. District Court for Western District of Washington, and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Other Professional Experience: Prior to law school taught school in inner city Houston. While attending law school worked full time as a public information officer with the Prosecutors Office in Cleveland, Ohio.

Education: Case Western Reserve University, BA English and Political Science; Cleveland Marshall School of Law, JD.

Community Service: Active in church, Superior Court Judicial Association committees, Drug Court Associations, Relay for Life and on community boards.

Statement: We need judges who are nonpartisan, fair, knowledgeable about the law, and deeply committed to justice for all.

Five years ago, the Judges of Thurston County Superior Court chose Indu to serve as Court Commissioner because they knew they could rely on her expertise and fairness in the administration of justice for families, juvenile offenders and crime victims.

In addition to five years of judicial experience, Commissioner Thomas has enforced the law as an assistant attorney general, drafted the law as nonpartisan legal counsel to the State Senate and defended individuals as a public defender.

Commissioner Thomas lives in Thurston County with her husband, their 15 year old son, and her husband's parents. The daughter of a pastor and a teacher, she is active in her church and her community. Her broad and deep experience, coupled with her personal commitment to justice for all, will make her an outstanding judge.


Campaign Website: www.peopleforinduthomas.com | Facebook  
Email: Vote4InduThomas@gmail.com
 
Opponents: Allen Miller, Erik Price
 
   
 
Video forum:


Candidate ratings and poll:

ORGANIZATION ALLEN
MILLER
ERIK
PRICE
INDU
THOMAS
Joint Asian
Judicial

Evaluation Committee
Qualified * Qualified
Latina/o Bar Ass'n
of Washington
Well Qualified * Well Qualified
Q-Law: The GLBT
Bar Association

of Washington
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
* *
Thurston County Bar Ass'n
Members' Preference Poll
42 93 44
Washington Women Lawyers Qualified * Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings from all organizations for all candidates, and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER ALLEN
MILLER
ERIK
PRICE
INDU
THOMAS
The Olympian  

 

Finance report:

CANDIDATE UPDATED CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
Allen Miller 8/3/2012 $28,396.95
Personal Funds $6,000.00
$23,034.76
Erik Price 8/3/2012 $60,165.03
Personal Funds $3,555.00
Loans $5,000.00
$42,861.98
Indu Thomas 8/3/2012 $42,075.50
Personal Funds $22,000.00
Loans $5,000.00
$37,320.61

 
Media stories:
    July 27, 2012
The Olympian   Superior Court Position 4 candidates tout history
    July 13, 2012
The Olympian   Schaller, Price big winners in Thurston County judge bar poll

 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.