Archived Version: August 17, 2010


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Ratings and Endorsements

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Bryan Chushcoff

 

Washington Supreme Court

Position Six

Bryan Chushcoff

Legal/Judicial Experience: Judge and Lawyer: Bryan Chushcoff is Pierce County Superior Courtís Presiding Judge. He directs the Stateís second-largest trial court with a budget of nearly $14 million. Bryan has successfully solved legal problems as a judge for 14 years and as a lawyer for 19 years more. He has presided over thousands of legal proceedings including: contract rights, personal injury, family and criminal law. As a lawyer, Bryan represented hundreds of working families helping to solve a wide-range of legal problems.

Education: University of Puget Sound, Law degree; University of Washington, BA Business Administration; Wilson High School, Tacoma.

Statement: A Fair Judge. Bryan Chushcoff is a guardian of the law, the rights of the people and of the Constitution. He is a smart, common sense, veteran judge. Every day at work, he applies the law with fairness and compassion without promoting a personal agenda.

A Proven Leader. The people of Washington State deserve Supreme Court Justices who can work together. Bryan's colleagues twice elected him Presiding Judge. Bryan is a proven leader and imaginative problem solver who improved the efficiency of our justice system. Whether he's setting policies or dealing with budget cuts, he is a good steward of Washington's court system and the public's money.

A Justice for All. "I grew up in Washington and want to keep it a safe and prosperous place for our families. I worked on an assembly line to help pay for school. In time, I opened my own practice and met payroll for 19 years. Your concerns are my concerns. Having devoted over thirty years to Washington law, I would be honored to serve as your Supreme Court Justice.

Judge Chushcoff and his wife, Jennifer, live in Tacoma.


 
Official web site: www.Chushcoff4Justice.com  
Opponents: Richard Sanders | Charlie Wiggins
 
Questionnaire responses: For Municipal League of King County
 

 
Streaming video: For Position 6
 

Video Voters' Guide:


 
Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION BRYAN
CHUSHCOFF
RICHARD
SANDERS
CHARLIE
WIGGINS
King County Bar Association Qualified Well Qualified Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Tacoma-Pierce County
Bar Association
* * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Municipal League
of King County
Very Good Good Outstanding
Joint Asian
Judicial Evaluations Committee
* * Well Qualified
Latina/o Bar Association
of Washington
* * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Loren Miller Bar Association * * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Washington Association
of Prosecuting Attorneys
Qualified * Well Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER BRYAN
CHUSHCOFF
RICHARD
SANDERS
CHARLIE
WIGGINS
Centralia Chronicle    
Everett Herald  
Kitsap Sun  
Longview Daily News    
Seattle Times    
Spokane Spokesman-Review    
Tacoma News Tribune  
Tri-City Herald    
Vancouver Columbian    
Walla Walla Union-Bulletin    
Yakima Herald    

 
Finance report:

(Click a dollar figure for detailed information.)

CANDIDATE REPORT DATE CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
Bryan Chushcoff 8/17/2010 $0.00 $1194.60
Richard Sanders 8/17/2010 $200,738.40 $152,599.53
Charlie Wiggins 8/17/2010 $149,483.30
(Personal Funds $6,000.00)
$108,618.40

 
Media stories:
    August 17, 2010
Seattle Times   Incumbent WA justices face tough re-election bids
    August 14, 2010
Tri-City Herald   Challengers accuse Supreme Court justice of bias
    August 13, 2010
The Olympian   Supreme Court candidates refusing 'ethics' pledge
    August 9, 2010
Seattle P-I   [Column] Right-thinking, activist judges need replacing
    August 7, 2010
Spokesman-Review   Challengers to Sanders perk up state court ballot
    August 3, 2010
Vancouver Columbian   Judicial candidates discuss bench philosophies at forum
    August 1, 2010
Peninsula Daily News   Supreme Court justice candidates appear at Port Ludlow forum
    July 30, 2010
The Olympian   Justice Sanders' behavior is issue in state court race
    July 29, 2010
Seattle Times   Justice Richard Sanders, as usual, draws fire from two election opponents
    July 28, 2010
Peninsula Daily News   State judge hopefuls spar during forum
    July 25, 2010
Seattle Times   3 Wash. Supreme Court justices seek re-election
    July 20, 2010
Vancouver Columbian   Supreme Court candidates describe themselves, each other
    June 18, 2010
Bellingham Herald   AWB backs incumbents on state Supreme Court
    June 3, 2010
Yakima Herald   Justice Sanders responds to challenger's criticisms
    May 2, 2010
Aberdeen Daily World   High court challenger questions decisions of Justice Richard Sanders
    April 28, 2010
Yakima Herald   Bainbridge Island attorney to challenge for high court seat
    March 2, 2010
Tacoma News Tribune   Sanders to stand for re-election to court
    March 1, 2010
Kitsap Business Journal   Supreme Court Justice Richard Sanders announces re-election bid
    February 20, 2010
Seattle Times   Bainbridge attorney to run against Justice Sanders

 
 
   
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.