Archived Version: August 17, 2010


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Ratings and Endorsements

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Matt Williams

 

King County District Court

Southeast Division, Position Six

This race will appear on the November ballot.

 
Official web site: www.mattwilliamsforjudge.com  
Opponent: David Tracy
 
Questionnaire responses: For King County Bar Association
For Municipal League of King County
For King County Democrats
 

 
Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION DAVID
TRACY
MATTHEW
WILLIAMS
King County Bar Association Well Qualified Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Joint Asian
Judicial Evaluation Committee
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
*
Latina/o Bar Association
of Washington
Qualified *
Municipal League of King County Very Good Very Good

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate.


 

Finance report:

(Click a dollar figure for detailed information.)

CANDIDATE REPORT DATE CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
David Tracy 6/20/2010 $5,995.02 $1,270.02
Matthew Williams 6/20/2010 $23,100.85 $16,722.70

 
   
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.