|
|
||
Seattle TimesEndorsements |
||
Anne Ellington for Court of Appeals judgeThe Seattle Times endorses Judge Anne Ellington for re-election to the Washington Court of Appeals, Division 1. Her ability to see a deeper level of justice should earn her a third term.Monday, August 3, 2008 — Judge Anne Ellington should be re-elected to the Washington Court of Appeals, Division One. Ellington, 62, is seeking her third six-year term, and is challenged by Seattle personal-injury attorney Robert Kelly, 53. Ellington has made several bold decisions, including one July 13 on whether the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. was using cartoons in an advertisement in Rolling Stone. One of the images was a woman riding a tractor with film reels for wheels, with the tractor floating in air. The images were photos, not drawings, and a lower court judge said they were not cartoons. Ellington overruled him. By the definition R.J. Reynolds had agreed to in its contract with state attorneys general, she said, they were cartoons. Another Ellington decision came Jan. 12, in a truancy case involving a 13-year-old Bosnian immigrant girl in the Bellevue School District. Ellington used this case to rule that all children in initial truancy proceedings are entitled to an attorney. No other state offers such a right, but she made a compelling argument that it flowed from the historical meaning of due process of law. Ellington also made the news a year ago when she signed on to a ruling that overturned part of King County's Critical Areas Ordinances as an illegal tax on development. The truancy case pleased liberals; the critical-areas case pleased conservatives. In each matter Ellington was able to see a deeper matter of justice. She deserves your vote. |
||
|
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |
|