2008 Primary
An information resource for Washington voters
Robin Hunt
Washington Court of Appeals
Division II, District Two
This race will be decided in the Primary Election.
| ORGANIZATION |
TIM FORD |
ROBIN HUNT |
|
Joint Asian Judicial Evaluation Committee |
* |
Exceptionally Well Qualified |
|
Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys |
Not Qualified |
Exceptionally Well Qualified |
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details..
(Click a dollar figure for detailed data from the
Public Disclosure Commission. Note that summary numbers here might not match
detailed data for various reasons.)
| CANDIDATE | REPORT DATE | CONTRIBUTIONS | EXPENDITURES |
| Tim Ford | 05/31/2008 | $24,065.00 | $16,886.72 |
| Robin Hunt | 05/31/2008 | $26,602.21 | $12,761.81 |
| June 25, 2008 | ||
| Sequim Gazettte | Candidates contend for Court of Appeals judge spot | |
| June 22, 2008 | ||
| Peninsula Daily News | Candidates vie for grueling job; Ford challenges Hunt for Court of Appeals | |
| June 4, 2008 | ||
| Sequim Gazette | Appeals judge seeks re-election | |
| April 5, 2008 | ||
| The Olympian | Lawyer vies to replace judge | |
| March 10, 2008 | ||
| The Olympian | Ex-builders' lawyer Tim Ford running for judge |
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383
Write to
comments@votingforjudges.org.
Votingforjudges.org includes ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.