2008 Primary


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Around the Nation

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

 

Barbara Mack

 

King County Superior Court

Position 37

 
Official web site: www.mackforsuperiorcourt.com  
Opponent: Nic Corning and Jean Rietschel
 
Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION NIC
CORNING
BARBARA
MACK
JEAN
RIETSCHEL
King County
Bar Association
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Well Qualified Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Joint Asian
Judicial Evaluation Committee
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Well Qualified Exceptionally
Well Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 
Questionnaire responses: For King County Bar Association
For King County Democrats

 
Finance report:

(Click a dollar figure for detailed data from the Public Disclosure Commission. Note that summary numbers here might not match detailed data for various reasons.)

CANDIDATE REPORT DATE CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
Nic Corning 06/09/2008 $250.00 $250.00
Barbara Mack 05/31/2008 $17,411.51 $14,713.16
Jean Rietschel 05/31/2008 $18,510.00 $6,085.84

 
   
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.